Every person , whether natural or juridical express redress in the courts of law for the imposition of justice in all precondition situation . The court represented by the strain is seen as the final arbiter who puts an end to some(prenominal)(prenominal) given controversy where both(prenominal) parties lay down their positions and arguments and leaves it up to the judge to decide on the matter based on an mark and non subjective attitudeI agree with the above inverted comma butterfly that a strong duty of loyalty should be utilize only when it is transcend that the parties agree on it . When there is defecate evidence to the contrary , the courts should not obligate the parties to perform any(prenominal) duty not agreed upon by the partiesIt would be an iniquity to force a ships company who is not in disquietude with the proposition of the case to act in accordance with a duty not agreed upon by them .

This will fountain to speculations of the court acting in a biased mien since it would often result to a case where the other fellowship is forced to perform something favorable to the other . The courts should weigh each circumstance by listening and asking for evidence from both parties with equal opportunities given on both sides . It would be mischievous to force the other party to act in view with an alleged agreement where the evidence clearly points to the fact that much(prenominal) was not freely and volunta rily agreed upon by both partiesIt would how! ever...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay